PLGF、sFlt-1联合子宫动脉搏动指数对中高危因素孕妇子痫前期的预测价值
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

晋江市医院(上海市第六人民医院福建医院)

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

福建省科技创新联合资金项目资助(项目编号:2024Y9473);泉州市科技计划资助(项目编号:2023N021S)


Predictive value of PLGF, sFlt-1 combined with uterine artery pulsatility index for preeclampsia in pregnant women with medium to high risk factorsHuang Meihong1, Ni Jingling1, Shi Donghua1, Chen Yiling2, Xu Ronghai3*
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
    摘要:

    【摘要】目的:分析胎盘生长因子(PLGF)、可溶性血管内皮生长因子受体-1(sFlt-1)联合子宫动脉搏动指数(PI)对中高危因素孕妇子痫前期的预测价值。方法:选取2023年6月至2024年6月在本院门诊孕早期建卡的具有子痫前期中高危因素并正规产检的536例孕妇作为研究对象,检测孕妇的PLGF、sFlt-1、PI并记录其他临床资料。根据妊娠期内子痫前期的发生情况将中高危因素孕妇分为子痫前期组和正常组。比较两组PLGF、sFlt-1、PI和其他临床资料,采用Cox回归分析中高危因素孕妇子痫前期的风险因素,另通过受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析PLGF、sFlt-1联合PI对中高危因素孕妇子痫前期的预测价值。结果:536例中高危因素孕妇中,有82例并发子痫前期,发生率为15.30%。子痫前期组孕早期PLGF低于正常组(P<0.05),孕中期sFlt-1/PLGF、孕晚期sFlt-1/PLGF、孕早期PI和孕中期PI均高于正常组(P<0.05)。两组孕晚期sFlt-1/PLGF均高于孕中期sFlt-1/PLGF(P<0.05),孕中期PI均低于孕早期PI(P<0.05)。Cox回归分析显示,孕早期PLGF是中高危因素孕妇子痫前期的保护因素(P<0.05),孕中期sFlt-1/PLGF、孕晚期sFlt-1/PLGF、孕早期PI、孕中期PI、孕前BMI和高危因素是中高危因素孕妇子痫前期的危险因素(P<0.05)。孕早期PLGF、孕中期sFlt-1/PLGF、孕晚期sFlt-1/PLGF、孕早期PI、孕中期PI联合预测中高危因素孕妇子痫前期的灵敏度、特异度、曲线下面积(AUC)分别为95.12%、81.50%、0.913,其中灵敏度和AUC 均高于单项指标预测,特异度与单项指标预测相近。结论:孕早期PLGF、孕中期sFlt-1/PLGF、孕晚期sFlt-1/PLGF、孕早期PI、孕中期PI均是中高危因素孕妇子痫前期的影响因素,对子痫前期有预测价值,且上述指标联合预测时能进一步提高预测价值。

    Abstract:

    [Abstract] Objective: To analyze the predictive value of placental growth factor (PLGF), soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) combined with uterine artery pulsatility index (PI) for preeclampsia in pregnant women with medium to high risk factors. Methods: 536 pregnant women with medium to high risk factors for preeclampsia and regular prenatal check ups who were registered for early pregnancy in our outpatient department from June 2023 to June 2024 were selected as the research subjects, and the PLGF, sFlt-1 and PI of pregnant women were detected and other clinical data were recorded. According to the occurrence of preeclampsia during pregnancy, the pregnant women with medium to high risk factors were divided into preeclampsia group and normal group. The PLGF, sFlt-1, PI and other clinical data between the two groups were compared, and the influencing factors of preeclampsia in pregnant women with medium to high risk factors were analyzed using the stepwise multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model, and the predictive value of PLGF, sFlt-1 combined with PI for preeclampsia in pregnant women with medium to high risk factors were analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: 82 cases developed preeclampsia among 536 pregnant women with medium to high-risk factors, and the incidence rate was 15.30%. The first-trimester PLGFof the preeclampsia group was lower than that in the normal group (P<0.05), while the second-trimester sFlt-1/PLGF, third-trimester sFlt-1/PLGF, first-trimester PI and second-trimester PI were all higher than those in the normal group (P<0.05). The third-trimester sFlt-1/PLGF in two groups were higher than those the second-trimester sFlt-1/PLGF (P<0.05), while the second-trimester PI were lower than those the first-trimester PI (P<0.05). The Cox regression analysis showed that first-trimester PLGF was a protective factor for preeclampsia in pregnant women with medium to high risk factors (P<0.05), while the second-trimester sFlt-1/PLGF, third-trimester sFlt-1/PLGF, first-trimester PI, second-trimester PI, pre pregnancy BMI and high risk factor were risk factors for preeclampsia in pregnant women with medium to high risk factors (P<0.05). The sensitivity, specificity and area under curve (AUC) of the combined prediction of first-trimester PLGF, second-trimester sFlt-1/PLGF, third-trimester sFlt-1/PLGF, first-trimester PI and second-trimester PI for preeclampsia in pregnant women with medium to high risk factors were 95.12%, 81.50% and 0.913 respectively, and the sensitivity and AUC were higher than single indicator predictions, while specificity was similar to single indicator predictions. Conclusion: The first-trimester PLGF, second-trimester sFlt-1/PLGF, third-trimester sFlt-1/PLGF, first-trimester PI and second-trimester PI are all influencing factors factors for preeclampsia in pregnant women with medium to high risk factors, and they have predictive value for preeclampsia, and the combined prediction of the above indicators can further enhance the predictive value.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-06-24
  • 最后修改日期:2026-07-09
  • 录用日期:2026-09-07
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码