卡瑞利珠单抗诱发反应性皮肤毛细血管增生症1例
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

川北医学院附属医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

无


A Case of Reactive Cutaneous Capillary Proliferation Induced by Camrelizumab
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
    摘要:

    目的:总结卡瑞利珠单抗联合瑞戈非尼治疗肝癌诱发反应性皮肤毛细血管增生症(RCCEP)的诊疗要点,结合最新研究进展梳理管理策略。方法:回顾 1 例 56 岁肝癌合并糖尿病肾病患者完整临床、皮肤镜及病理资料,参照《肿瘤免疫检查点抑制剂引起皮肤不良反应多学科专家共识(2025版)》完成不良反应分级,予手术切除大皮损、液氮冷冻微小病灶,外用莫匹罗星软膏,随访 1 年。结果:患者免疫联合抗血管治疗 4 周期后面颈躯干多发易出血红色带蒂丘疹;皮肤镜见特征性血管腔隙与白幕征,病理示真皮良性分叶毛细血管增生,分级为2级反应性皮肤毛细血管增生症;局部治疗后随访 1 年皮损无复发。基础糖尿病微血管损伤加重皮损出血表现。结论:RCCEP为卡瑞利珠单抗特征性皮肤不良反应,合并糖尿病患者皮损症状更重;局限皮损优选局部微创处理,分级指导下个体化局部治疗方案符合国内指南推荐,RCCEP 提示抗肿瘤免疫获益,无严重感染无需停药。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To summarise the key points in the diagnosis and management of reactive cutaneous capillary proliferation (RCCEP) induced by the combination of camrelizumab and regorafenib in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma, and to outline management strategies in light of the latest research advances. Methods: We reviewed the complete clinical, dermatoscopic and pathological data of a 56-year-old patient with hepatocellular carcinoma and diabetic nephropathy. Cutaneous immune-related adverse event grade was assessed in accordance with Multidisciplinary Expert Consensus on Cutaneous Adverse Reactions Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (2025 Edition). The patient underwent surgical excision of large skin lesions and cryotherapy with liquid nitrogen for microscopic lesions, and was treated topically with mupirocin ointment, with a one-year follow-up. Results: Following four cycles of immunotherapy combined with anti-vascular therapy, the patient developed multiple, easily bleeding, red, pedunculated papules on the posterior neck and trunk; dermoscopy revealed characteristic vascular lacunae and the ‘white curtain’ sign, whilst histopathology demonstrated benign lobular capillary proliferation in the dermis. The lesion was graded as grade 2 RCCEP; after local treatment, there was no recurrence of the lesions at the one-year follow-up. Underlying diabetic microvascular damage exacerbated the haemorrhagic manifestations of the skin lesions. Conclusion: RCCEP is a characteristic cutaneous adverse reaction of camrelizumab; patients with concomitant diabetes present with more severe skin lesions. Localised lesions are best managed with minimally invasive topical treatment. Individualised local treatment plans developed under a tiered approach are in line with the recommendations of domestic guidelines. RCCEP indicates anti-tumour immune benefit; treatment need not be discontinued in the absence of severe infection.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-06-29
  • 最后修改日期:2026-08-01
  • 录用日期:2026-11-04
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码