不同抗病毒方案防治慢性乙型肝炎低病毒血症的疗效比较
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.广元市中心医院感染性疾病科;2.川北医学院附属医院感染科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

北京陈菊梅公益基金会(X20250674)


Comparison of the efficacy of different antiviral schemes in the prevention and treatment of chronic hepatitis B low-level viremia
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
    摘要:

    目的:本研究旨在系统性地比较不同抗病毒方案在防治慢性乙型肝炎患者出现低病毒血症方面的疗效差异。方法:(1)本研究回顾性纳入2023年1月至2024年6月于我院感染性疾病科诊治的CHB患者734例,分为非一线NAs组48例,一线NAs组585例,联合治疗组101例,一线NAs组分为ETV亚组(347例)、TDF亚组(140例)、TAF亚组(98例)。(2)分析LLV和HBsAg清除的独立影响因素,比较各组疗效差异,观察分析Peg-IFNα-2b治疗过程中病毒学与血清学标志物的动态演变规律。结果:基线高HBV DNA、高HBsAg、HBeAg阳性、肝硬化、肝癌为LLV独立危险因素。三组间LLV发生率存在显著差异(χ²=72.34,P<0.001):非一线NAs组LLV发生率最高,达47.92%;一线NAs组次之,为32.65%;联合治疗组最低,仅3.96%。联合治疗组CVR率随治疗时间延长呈持续上升趋势,在HBsAg动态下降方面表现突出。结论:不同抗病毒方案对LLV的防治效能存在显著差异,TAF可作为一线NAs中的优先选择;联合干扰素治疗为独立保护因素,干扰素让“功能性治愈”在优势人群中成为可及目标,临床医生应正确认识干扰素治疗过程中的一过性HBV DNA升高,并坚持足疗程治疗。

    Abstract:

    Objective: This study aims to systematically compare the efficacy differences of different antiviral regimens in preventing and treating low-level viremia in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Methods: (1) This study retrospectively included 734 CHB patients diagnosed and treated in the infectious diseases Department of our hospital from January 2023 to June 2024. They were divided into non first-line NAs group of 48 cases, first-line NAs group of 585 cases, and combined treatment group of 101 cases. The first-line NAs group was divided into ETV subgroup (347 cases), TDF subgroup (140 cases), and TAF subgroup (98 cases). (2) Analysis of independent influencing factors on LLV and HBsAg clearance.Compare the differences in therapeutic efficacy among different groups and observe and analyze the dynamic evolution of virological and serological markers during Peg-IFN α-2b treatment. Result: High baseline HBV DNA, high HBsAg, HBeAg positivity, liver cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma are independent risk factors for LLV.There was a significant difference in the incidence of LLV among the three groups (χ ²=72.34, P<0.001): the non first-line NAs group had the highest incidence of LLV, reaching 47.92%; The first-line NAs group is second, accounting for 32.65%; The combination therapy group had the lowest rate, only 3.96%. The CVR rate of the combination therapy group showed a continuous upward trend with prolonged treatment time, with outstanding performance in the dynamic decline of HBsAg. Conclusion: There are significant differences in the prevention and treatment efficacy of different antiviral regimens for LLV, and TAF can be the preferred choice among first-line NAs;Combined interferon therapy is an independent protective factor. Interferon has made "functional cure" an accessible target in advantageous populations. Clinical doctors should have a correct understanding of the transient HBV DNA elevation during interferon treatment and adhere to full course treatment.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-08-24
  • 最后修改日期:2026-10-13
  • 录用日期:2026-11-04
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码