床旁 COHb 检测在新生儿溶血病早期诊断与干预中的临床意义
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院南充医院·2.南充市中心医院;3.南充市中心医院儿科;4.首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院南充医院&5.#183;6.amp

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

四川省基层卫生事业发展研究中心科研项目(SWFZ24-Q-82)


Clinical Significance of Bedside COHb Detection in Early Diagnosis and Intervention of Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
    摘要:

    目的:本研究旨在探讨经多波长血氧分析仪(CO-oximetry)检测的碳氧血红蛋白(Carboxyhemoglobin, COHb)对胎儿新生儿溶血病(Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn, HDFN)早期辅助诊断及预判临床干预方案选择的临床价值。方法:收集高胆红素血症患儿310例,采用回顾性分析方法,根据血型不合及临床诊断分为以下三组:溶血组为存在血型不合且临床诊断为HDFN者,该组进一步根据血清学检测结果分为确诊亚组113例(直接Coombs试验(DAT)和/或释放试验阳性)和可疑亚组53例(仅血清游离抗体试验阳性);对照组为溶血三项试验为阴性、临床排除HDFN的患儿144例。收集各组患儿的体重、胎龄、诊断日龄等临床资料,并检测其COHb、血红蛋白(Hemoglobin, Hb)、网织红细胞百分比(Reticulocyte%,Ret%)和血清总胆红素(Total Bilirubin, TBIL)水平及溶血三项试验结果,进而分析COHb水平对HDFN发生的预测价值,以及其对溶血严重程度的评估价值。结果:溶血组与对照组就诊日龄、胎龄、喂养方式方面差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),出生体重、性别方面均无显著差异。溶血组与对照组间在入院时TBIL、Hb、COHb、Ret%方面差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),溶血组的COHb值高于对照组(中位数1.5% vs 1.2%,P<0.01)。溶血组中ABO-HDFN占比为96.39%,确诊组COHb高于可疑组(P<0.05),COHb值越高,溶血组光疗次数越多,换血及使用免疫球蛋白比例越高。COHb临界值1.45%对HDFN的诊断具有70.48%的敏感性和86.84%的特异性。COHb、Ret%和Hb联合诊断可提高灵敏度(74.43%)与特异度(87.61%)。结论:溶血组COHb水平显著高于对照组,确诊亚组COHb高于可疑亚组。COHb水平越高,临床干预需求越大。COHb可作为HDFN辅助诊断及严重程度评估的参考指标。

    Abstract:

    Objective: This study aimed to explore the clinical value of carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) measured by multi-wavelength CO-oximetry for the early auxiliary diagnosis of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) and prediction of the selection of clinical intervention strategies. Methods: A total of 310 neonates with hyperbilirubinemia were enrolled in this retrospective study. According to blood group incompatibility and clinical diagnosis, the subjects were divided into two groups: the hemolysis group, consisting of neonates with blood group incompatibility and clinically diagnosed HDFN, which was further subdivided into two subgroups: confirmed subgroup (113 cases, positive direct Coombs test (DAT) and/or antibody release test) and suspected subgroup (53 cases, only positive serum free antibody test); the control group included 144 neonates with negative results of three hemolysis tests and clinically excluded HDFN. Clinical data including birth weight, gestational age and age at diagnosis were collected. Laboratory indicators including COHb, hemoglobin (Hb), percentage of reticulocytes (Ret%), total serum bilirubin (TBIL) and results of three hemolysis tests were detected. We analyzed the predictive value of COHb for HDFN and its efficacy in evaluating the severity of hemolysis. Results: There were statistically significant differences in age at admission, gestational age and feeding patterns between the hemolysis group and the control group (P<0.05), while no significant differences were observed in birth weight and gender. Significant differences were found in admission TBIL, Hb, COHb and Ret% between the two groups (P<0.05). The median COHb level in the hemolysis group was higher than that in the control group (1.5% vs 1.2%, P<0.01). ABO-HDFN accounted for 96.39% of the hemolysis group. The COHb level of the confirmed subgroup was higher than that of the suspected subgroup (P<0.05). Higher COHb levels were correlated with more frequent phototherapy, higher rates of exchange transfusion and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) use. The COHb cut-off value of 1.45% yielded a sensitivity of 70.48% and a specificity of 86.84% for diagnosing HDFN. Combined detection of COHb, Ret% and Hb improved the diagnostic sensitivity (74.43%) and specificity (87.61%). Conclusion: The COHb level was significantly higher in the hemolysis group than in the control group, and higher in the confirmed subgroup than in the suspected subgroup. Higher COHb levels were associated with greater requirements for clinical interventions. COHb can serve as a reference indicator for auxiliary diagnosis and severity assessment of HDFN.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-08-24
  • 最后修改日期:2026-10-17
  • 录用日期:2026-10-26
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码