三种入路方式置入椎弓根螺钉治疗单节段胸腰椎骨折患者的围术期指标和预后比较
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

安徽省高校自然科学研究重点项目(KJ2021ZD0035);


Comparative study of perioperative indexes and prognosis for three differ-ent approaches in treating patients with single-segment thoracolumbar frac-ture
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
    摘要:

    目的:探究经后正中入路、经Wiltse肌间隙入路和经皮入路置入椎弓根螺钉治疗对单节段胸腰椎骨折患者围术期指标和预后的影响。方法:根据术式不同将入院就诊的90例单节段胸腰椎骨折患者分为后正中入路组(n=34)、Wiltse入路组(n=28)和经皮入路组(n=28)。比较各组患者围术期指标、骨代谢指标、血清肌酶水平、胸腰椎恢复效果和术后并发症发生情况。结果:Wiltse入路组、经皮入路组和后正中入路组的手术时间、住院时间和切口长度均依次增加(P<0.05)。术后48 h, Wiltse入路组、经皮入路组和后正中入路组的骨钙素(OC)、骨保护素(OPG)和Ⅰ型前胶原N端前肽(PINP)水平均依次降低(P<0.05);Wiltse入路组与经皮入路组血清肌酶水平均低于后正中入路组(P<0.05)。各组患者中Wiltse入路组术后胸腰椎长期恢复效果最佳(P<0.05)。各组患者术后并发症总发生率无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:经Wiltse肌间隙入路治疗单节段胸腰椎骨折效果较好,且未增加并发症的发生。

    Abstract:

    Objective:To explore the effects of pedicle screw placement through posterior median approach,Wiltse intermuscular space approach and percutaneous approach on perioperative indexes and prognosis in patients with single-segment thoracolumbar frac-ture.Methods:According to different surgical methods,90 patients with single-segment thoracolumbar fracture in the hospital were di-vided into posterior median approach group(n=34),Wiltse approach group(n=28)and percutaneous approach group(n=28).The perioperative indexes,bone metabolism indexes,serum muscle enzymes,thoracolumbar recovery and postoperative complications were compared among the three groups.Results:In Wiltse approach group,percutaneous approach group and posterior median approach group,operation time,length of hospital stay and incision length were gradually increased(P<0.05).At 48 h after surgery,levels of osteocalcin(OC),osteoprotegerin(OPG)and procollagen type Ⅰ N-terminal propeptid(PINP)were gradually decreased in Wiltse ap-proach group,percutaneous approach group and posterior median approach group(P<0.05).The levels of serum creatine kinase in Wiltse approach group and percutaneous approach group was lower than that in posterior median approach group(P<0.05).At 3 months and 1 year after surgery,Wiltse approach group had the best recovery effect on thoracolumbar spine(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the total incidence of postoperative complications among the three groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:Among the three methods,curative effect of Wiltse intermuscular space approach is better in single-segment thoracolumbar fracture,with low inci-dence of complications.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

孙治邦;邵松;.三种入路方式置入椎弓根螺钉治疗单节段胸腰椎骨折患者的围术期指标和预后比较[J].川北医学院学报,2025,40(4):484-487 509.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-07-24
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码