不同入路PVP术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效和并发症对比研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R687.3

基金项目:

江苏省第五期“333工程”科研项目(BRA2020215);


Comparative study on the efficacy and complications of different approa-ches of PVP in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression frac-tures
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
    摘要:

    目的:比较不同入路经皮椎体成形术(PVP)治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCFs)的疗效和安全性。方法:收集行PVP术治疗的180例OVCFs患者进行研究。按手术入路方式不同分组,其中行单侧椎弓根入路PVP为单侧入路组(n=88);行双侧椎弓根入路PVP为双侧入路组(n=92)。患者于术前、术后1个月及术后12个月均完成视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)的评定,并完成伤椎前缘高度和后凸Cobb角的测量;对比两组患者手术相关指标和并发症情况。结果:单侧入路组较双侧入路组手术时间更短(P<0.05),术中出血量和透视次数更少(P<0.05),骨水泥量更低(P<0.05)。两组患者术后1、12个月的VAS评分、ODI指数与术前比较均下降(P<0.05),伤椎前缘高度和后凸Cobb角较术前改善(P<0.05)。两组患者术前及术后VAS评分、ODI指数和影像学参数比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。单侧入路组患者骨水泥渗漏发生率为13.64%,与双侧入路组患者骨水泥渗漏发生率的17.39%比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:单侧椎弓根入路PVP术可获得与双侧椎弓根入路PVP术相似的疗效,相比双侧入路手术,单侧入路手术具有手术时间短、放射损害少的优势。

    Abstract:

    Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of different approaches of percutaneous vertebroplasty(PVP)in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures(OVCFs).Methods:A total of 180 patients with OVCFs treated by PVP were collected and divided into two groups according to different surgical approaches.Among them,88 patients under-went unilateral pedicle approach PVP as unilateral approach group,and 92 patients underwent bilateral pedicle approach PVP as bilateral approach group.The visual analogue scale(VAS)pain score and Oswestry disability index(ODI)were evaluated be-fore operation,1 month and 12 months after operation,and the anterior vertebral height and kyphosis Cobb angle were meas-ured.The operation related indexes and complications of the two groups were compared.Results:Compared with the bilateral approach group,the unilateral approach group had shorter operation time(P<0.05),less intraoperative blood loss and fluoros-copy times(P<0.05),and lower bone cement volume(P<0.05).The VAS score and ODI index of the two groups at 1 month and 12 months after operation were lower than those before operation(P<0.05).The height of the anterior edge of the injured vertebra and the Cobb angle of the kyphosis were improved compared with those before operation(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in VAS score,ODI index and above imaging parameters between the two groups before and after operation(P>0.05).The incidence of bone cement leakage in the unilateral approach group was 13.64%,and the incidence of bone cement leakage in the bilateral approach group was 17.39%,there was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:Unilateral pedicle approach PVP can achieve similar efficacy as bilateral pedicle approach PVP.Com-pared with bilateral approach surgery,unilateral approach surgery has the advantages of shorter operation time and less radia-tion damage.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

仓定伟;刘进;刘幸生;纪标;宋长志;.不同入路PVP术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效和并发症对比研究[J].川北医学院学报,2025,40(11):1408-1412.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-12-22
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码