TAVR与SAVR对主动脉瓣重度狭窄患者围术期心肌损伤的影响
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R654.2

基金项目:

河北省卫生健康委员会重点科技研究计划(20240119);


Impact of TAVR versus SAVR on perioperative myocardial injury in patients with severe aortic stenosis
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
    摘要:

    目的:探讨经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)与外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)对主动脉瓣重度狭窄患者心肌损伤的程度及对心肌灌注的影响。方法:回顾性分析77例行TAVR或SAVR手术并完成1个月随访的主动脉瓣重度狭窄且无明显冠脉狭窄患者的临床资料。观察心肌损伤指标:术前及术后1、3、7 d、1个月的肌酸激酶同工酶-MB(CK-MB)、肌钙蛋白Ⅰ(cTnⅠ),心肌灌注指标:术前及术后1个月应用静息动态单光子发射计算机断层扫描系统(D-SPECT);瑞加诺生负荷D-SPECT检查心肌17节段分布下心肌灌注总积分、心肌缺血总节段数、左心室射血分数(LVEF)、左心室舒张末期容积(LVEDV)和异常灌注面积情况。通过上述指标评价TAVR和SAVR对心肌损伤、心肌灌注的影响。结果:心肌损伤指标:两组患者cTnI、CK-MB均随时间变化明显,在术后1 d达到峰值,两组患者组间对比,TAVR组低于SAVR组(P<0.05)。心肌灌注指标:术后1个月,两组患者在心肌缺血节段数、心肌灌注总积分和异常灌注面积较术前明显改善(P<0.05);TAVR组在静息+负荷心肌灌注总评分和异常灌注面积优于SAVR组(P<0.05)。结论:TAVR和SAVR手术均可改善心肌灌注水平;术中的心肌损伤,TAVR较SAVR更小;术后1个月的心肌灌注,TAVR较SAVR更优。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To explore the extent of myocardial injury and the impact on myocardial perfusion in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 77 patients with severe aortic valve stenosis and no significant coronary artery stenosis who underwent TAVR and SAVR surgeries and completed a 1-month follow-up. Myocardial injury indicators were observed: creatine kinase MB (CK-MB) and troponin I (cTnI) before surgery and on postoperative day 1, 3, 7, and 1 month. Myocardial perfusion indicators were also observed: total myocardial perfusion score, total number of myocardial ischemic segments, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and abnormal perfusion area under the 17-segment myocardial perfusion distribution using rest dynamic single-photon emission computed tomography (D-SPECT) + regadenoson stress D-SPECT before and 1 month after surgery. The above indicators were used to evaluate the impact of TAVR and SAVR on myocardial injury and myocardial perfusion. Results: Myocardial injury indicators: Both cTnI and CK-MB in the two groups of patients showed significant changes over time, reaching their peak values on postoperative day 1, and the TAVR group was lower than the SAVR group (P<0.05). Myocardial perfusion indicators: 1 month post-operation, both groups showed significant improvement in the number of myocardial ischemic segments, total myocardial perfusion score, and abnormal perfusion area compared to pre-operative levels (P<0.05). The TAVR group demonstrated better results in terms of total myocardial perfusion score under rest and stress conditions, as well as abnormal perfusion area, compared to the SAVR group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Both TAVR and SAVR can improve myocardial perfusion levels, TAVR causes less myocardial damage during surgery and offers superior myocardial perfusion improvement 1 month post-surgery compared to SAVR.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

赵永峰;杨雅钗;李柳;邓岐;陈勤聪;王硕. TAVR与SAVR对主动脉瓣重度狭窄患者围术期心肌损伤的影响[J].川北医学院学报,2026,41(3):320-324.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-04-26
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码