螺旋输送器与单纯使用输送头输送iRoot SP封闭剂对根管填充效果的影响分析
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R781.05

基金项目:

江苏省南京市卫生科技发展专项资金项目(YKK23183);


Analysis of influence of screw conveyor and simple use of conveyor head to transport iRoot SP sealant on root canal filling effect
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
    摘要:

    目的:探究螺旋输送器与单纯使用输送头输送iRootSP封闭剂对根管填充效果的影响。方法:回顾性分析102例(194颗牙)上颌前磨牙根管填充患者的临床资料,依填充方式分为观察组(55例,99颗牙,螺旋输送器填充)与对照组(47例,95颗牙,单纯输送头填充)。比较两组根管填充时间和根管填充质量,采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)比较两组患者填充后即刻、1周、1、2个月的疼痛情况,比较牙周指标[牙周探诊深度(PD)、探诊出血指数(PBI)、菌斑指数(PI)]的差异,记录并发症发生情况。结果:观察组填充时间短于对照组[(17.25±2.16)min vs.(20.58±3.02)min,P<0.05],填充优良率高于对照组(89.90%vs.78.95%,P<0.05)。填充后即刻两组VAS评分无统计学差异(P>0.05),之后各时间点观察组评分均低于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后两组牙周指标均改善(P<0.05),但组间无统计学差异(P>0.05),两组患者并发症无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:与单纯输送头相比,螺旋输送器可缩短填充时间、提升质量、缓解术后疼痛,两种方式均利于牙周健康且安全性良好。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To explore the influence of screw conveyor and simple use of conveyor head to transport iRoot SP sealant on root canal filling effect. Methods: The clinical data of 102 patients (194 teeth) with root canal filling of maxillary premolars were retrospectively analyzed. According to the filling methods, the patients were divided into observation group (55 cases, 99 teeth, screw conveyor filling) and control group (47 cases, 95 teeth, simple use of conveyor head filling). The root canal filling time and root canal filling quality were compared between the two groups. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to compare the pain status in the two groups immediately after filling and at 1 week, 1 month and 2 months after filling. The differences in periodontal indexes [periodontal probing depth (PD), probing bleeding index (PBI), plaque index (PI)] were compared, and the complications were recorded. Results: The root canal filling time in observation group was shorter than that in control group [(17.25±2.16) min vs. (20.58±3.02) min, P<0.05], and the excellent and good rate of filling was higher than that in control group (89.90% vs. 78.95%, P<0.05). There was no difference in VAS score between the two groups immediately after filling (P>0.05). At each time point after filling, the VAS score in observation group was lower than that in control group (P < 0.05). After treatment, the periodontal indexes in the two groups were improved, but there were no differences between groups (P>0.05), and no differences were observed in the incidence rates of complications (P>0.05). Conclusion: Compared with simple use of conveyor head, screw conveyor can better shorten the filling time, improve the quality, and relieve the postoperative pain. Both methods are beneficial to periodontal health, with safety.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

姜苏;李雯;李鑫;郭世梁.螺旋输送器与单纯使用输送头输送iRoot SP封闭剂对根管填充效果的影响分析[J].川北医学院学报,2026,41(3):360-364.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-04-26
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码